Katelyn Spurgin

Theatre Artist, Scholar, Lover of Words

Category: Shakespeare

  • “But mention Shakespeare to the class and you will feel it groan.”

    ~Toby Thompson

                I cannot remember the exact time or place when I fell in love with Shakespeare. The moment was rather a series of small moments that slowly but surely shaped the way I view the so-called “Bard of Avon.” That view constantly shifts as it encounters new information and insights about Shakespeare and the way his work is perceived. The biggest shift and revelation for me – the one that informs all the work I do now – is that Shakespeare has been hoisted so high up on a pedestal that most young people now have the notion that Shakespeare is only for “smart” or “elite” people – which can cause those who do not identify as part of this group to immediately shut down. Rather than being set up for success, we see students doubting their own abilities because they are told before even encountering the plays that Shakespeare is “complicated.” In The Disappearing Dais, his comprehensive guide to English teaching, Frank Whitehead questions how many of Shakespeare’s plays “really come within the linguistic and emotional range of the young adolescent?” (qtd. in Blocksidge 8). Whitehead’s early twentieth century stance lays the foundation from which stems our current educational Shakespeare tenets. This academic dismissal of a young person’s ability to connect to Shakespeare’s texts reveals the shortcomings of an approach that not only dismisses young people’s capabilities but also venerates the plays’ complexities in ways that hinder connection and comprehension. Add to the mix the increasing dependence on digital technologies and almost three years in a global pandemic and you have the perfect storm. The combination of a foregone conclusion and the circumstantial barriers means many will not even consider Shakespeare because they have been told as much.

    The academic insistence on the plays’ complexity, epitomized in Whitehead’s comment, provides the fundamental barrier to Shakespeare for today’s youth. While resources such as No Fear Shakespeare (created by SparkNotes) are intended to be useful tools in the classroom, they in fact create a further divide with their simplification of the plays. These go-to resources for the average adult or teacher immediately bring a caveat into the room: This is meant to be difficult but we have to do it. No Fear Shakespeare advertises itself as a “translation into modern English” but in so doing students are deprived of the opportunity to meet the text and understand it on their own terms (“No Fear Shakespeare”). The very name includes “Fear,” implying that any Shakespeare text always has something to fear. The set up for difficulty – and thereby disconnection – happens before the student even gets to the first line.

    On top of this already complicated view, the younger generations of the twenty-first century cope with shorter attention spans and massive changes in how they view language. To clarify, I do not regard shorter attention spans as a negative thing about today’s youth that needs changing. Rather, the digital and cultural shifts of the last two decades have naturally caused a shift in the way younger generations approach everything. Similarly, Millennials approach things differently to the Boomer generation – it is a recurring evolution. Shortened words, phrases, some thoughts even expressed completely through an image or gif are now normal modes of communication. While there is nothing wrong with language adapting – as it has done for centuries – when connecting with an older text there can be an automatic assumption that students will not understand. This intersection is where we can come in as theatre practitioners and offer ways to make these early modern plays not only accessible, but exciting to younger audiences. Producing plays that do not “dumb down” the language of the text necessarily, but rather plays that meet students where they are.

    Excerpt from “Bringing Down the Barrier: Directing Strategies for Inclusive, Engaging Shakespeare for Young Audiences” by Katelyn Spurgin

  • Today’s US society is fractured – split down the middle with extreme positions on either side. In the culture wars of today, nothing is safe. That includes the plays of William Shakespeare. Two years ago, leftists were calling for the end of Shakespeare in schools, believe his work to be misogynistic, racist, classist, and full of white-supremacy – everything the far left hates. Now the far right has come for the bard as well. Only yesterday, Florida’s legislation limiting classroom materials that “contain pornography or obscene depictions of sexual conduct” found Shakespeare. School districts are re-arranging curriculum that only includes excerpts of his plays. (Remember that scene in Romeo and Juliet where Romeo leaves Juliet after spending the night with her? We can’t have that. Parting is such sweet sorrow.)

    I guess that sums it up. Shakespeare cannot please everyone. And you know what? I think he knew that and didn’t care. We love to tout that Shakespeare’s plays are timeless, but in truth, Shakespeare wrote for his time. Theatre was for the masses and the masses wanted epics, clowns, raunchy jokes, suggestive innuendo, and, as the true biography Shakespeare in Love says, “a bit with a dog.”

    Let me be clear: There is content in Shakespeare that is not appropriate for younger students. It’s the same principle as when theatre directors cut plays – we must consider the audience. When cutting Macbeth in preparation for an educational touring show, we did not include the killing of young MacDuff onstage. We did not sexualize the Macbeths as many productions have before. This play was for young audiences and the cut reflected that.

    But this extreme view of what his plays depict is the cultural reality of today. We are losing the open mind, and the blinders are on. We are losing our bravery. One of the beautiful things about the arts is that they will always be different based on the producer of the work and the receiver of the work. It is not one size fits all, made for everyone, to please everyone. You can go to a play and hear something you don’t like or disagree with, and that’s okay. How you respond to art is up to you – it requires emotion and connection. It doesn’t have to be pleasant and “safe.” But you do have to be open to meeting it. Willing to receive the good, the bad, and the ugly.

    Shakespeare’s plays contain some ugly things: War, rape, death, slavery. But what makes the plays worth coming back to is the human expression within them. That is what is timeless. The plays were written 400 years ago for audiences 400 years ago. What we find within them still is the human condition. And the human condition is messy.

    Shakespeare didn’t need to please everyone. He still doesn’t need to please everyone. He is where he is in US education today because we put him there. If you want to keep him there, fine, but remember that you need to consider the whole perspective – The good, the bad, and the ugly.

    Note: The thoughts expressed here are my own stream of consciousness responses to these events and reports. As with art, you don’t have to like or agree with them.

    By Katelyn Spurgin

    August 9, 2023